Should you keep your guns in storage if you have kids?

It is quite an interesting question and you must be extremely worried about finding a proper answer to this question because the situation is really critical for you. A house with kids is always filled with a lot of risks as you never know that what blunder they’re going to make next. Sometimes, they jump off the floor or sometimes they put something on fire and you can’t say them anything as they’re innocent.

In this situation, you can never think of keeping your guns or any other harmful equipment at your home that may be dangerous for you or your kids. But the problem is that some people keep the gun for hunting purpose or just for fun while there are others who keep their guns at their home for self-defense and you never know that when an intruder would enter your home.

The situation is extremely critical and you don’t have a solution for this problem, therefore, you’ve come to us to find a satisfactory answer. Well, you should feel comfortable now as you’ve come to the right place because here we’re going to share some ideas with you according to your situation. Let’s take a look at these ideas.

Storage

If you’ve kept a weapon or gun at your home for hunting or as a hobby, then we recommend that you shift that gun to the storage as soon as possible as it is useless for you unless you go out for hunting or shooting.

There are different storage options that you can choose from according to your requirements. In our opinion, Mini Storage Carolina in Charlotte is one of the best options for you to keep your gun safe.

Before choosing storage, you need to make sure that they are reliable and registered as you can never believe someone for such a responsible task blindly. If you didn’t care for these things, you’ll be putting yourself at a great risk as you never know how they will use your weapon. If they misused your weapon, the court will consider you the guilty of crime as the weapon is registered with your name.

So, try to make sure the reliability if you don’t want to get into trouble. It’s better that you take help from a friend to choose a reliable storage.

A secure place in your home

If you’ve kept the guns for security reasons, we recommend that you keep them in a secure way. Keeping the guns in your bed’s side table or cupboard is completely full of risks. You must prepare a secret place in your home to keep the gun so that no one else can misuse it.

Lock

You can also keep the gun in a locked room or cupboard where your kids cannot reach. But make sure the lock you’re going to use is completely secure and unbreakable. Thus, you’ll be able to use the weapon whenever you need. It and your kids will also stay safe from it.…

HISTORY OF THE CLINTON GUN BAN

HISTORY OF THE CLINTON GUN BAN

Newly elected President Bill Clinton wasted little time in seizing upon “assault weapons” as a political issue. Along with “midnight basketball” and the never-to-be-fulfilled promise of 100,000 new police officers, it quickly became part of an effort to transform concern for public safety into a political issue.

Clinton had barely finished moving into the White House when he proclaimed we “can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans to legitimately own handguns and rifles.” Then, stringing together several whoppers in a single sentence, he announced, “I don’t believe that everybody in America needs to be able to buy a semi-automatic or fully-automatic weapon, built only for the purpose of killing people, in order to protect the right of Americans to hunt and practice marksmanship and to be secure.”

Of course, not everybody in American can buy a firearm—felons, drug addicts, illegal aliens and fugitives from justice, for example, can not—and ownership of fully-automatic firearms has been heavily regulated by federal law since 1934. And, of course, semi-automatic firearms, which have been around for more than a century, are used by millions of Americans for hunting, self-defense, recreational target shooting and in formal marksmanship competitions such as the Olympics.

Like all firearms, except for fully-automatic machine guns, semi-automatics—including those defined as “assault weapons” by the Clinton ban—fire only once each time the trigger is pulled. They also use the same ammunition as other types of guns.

“Gun control” advocates claim that various military-style attachments—attachments that in their minds re-define semi-automatic firearms as “assault weapons”—provide advantages to criminals. But even the rabidly anti-gun Washington Post admits, “Assault weapons play a part in only a small percentage of crime.” Data from police experts must be deliberately avoided by those pushing “assault weapons” bills. A clear case in point is the internal memorandum to California Assistant Attorney General Patrick Kenady that warned: “Information on assault weapons would not be sought from forensics laboratories as it was unlikely to support the theses on which the “Assault Weapons” ban legislation would be based.”

Members of Congress who voted for the Clinton ban in 1994 disregarded hard evidence, pretending instead that BATF trace data “proved” widespread criminal “assault weapon” use. They ignored the Congressional Research Service’s finding that: “Firearms selected for tracing . . . cannot be considered representative of the larger universe of all firearms used by criminals, or of any subset of that universe. As a result, data from the tracing system may not be appropriate for drawing inferences such as which makes or models of firearms are used for illicit purposes.”

The American people eventually learned the truth, and it was not surprising then that pro-ban votes cost—by Bill Clinton’s count—at least 20 Democrats their seats in the next election. Nor was is surprising that less than two years after its passage, the House of Representatives voted 239 to 173 to repeal the Clinton gun ban.

A decade has passed, and both the facts and the goals of anti-gun politicians remain unchanged.

For Bill Clinton Gun Ban Bill and Gun Ban US. Visit www.clintongunban.com

What it takes to be the security for the President

What it takes to be the security for the President

Choosing a career is an important decision to make and choosing the right career is the right decision to make. The secret service is always looking to recruit talented and skilled individuals. It is the security in charge of the president and vice president’s protection and the protection of their immediate families.The president’s safety is the forefront of keeping a country safe because if the secret service does not protect the president, then the country is not protected.

This team carries out investigations, conducts research, analyzes information and prepare reports on matters concerning national security. Secret service agents work as a team with other partners of the government to unearth the needs of intelligence and report back to senior government offices. You must be mature and self-confident and possess excellent analyzing and investigative skills; must be able to examine situations fast to take the correct course of action.

You should be able to work in unpredictable conditions and environments of different threat levels. Prospective agents should be citizens and should earn a bachelor’s degree. The secret service does not necessarily point out the fields of study though it is advisable to take coursework in law, computer science, mathematics, communication and foreign languages. It is important to obtain a graduate level degree or gain experience in state or the local law enforcing agencies possibly as a police officer, and to get a Class D Security license to have an added advantage in the hunt for this job. This field will give you a notch over the others considering the experience part of the job.

 

 

After you qualify for the position, you get to spend many weeks training for the new job; this may include learning important police techniques such as how to use firearms and using them safely, what you are required to do with arms and when to use the arms. You also get to learn different methods on how to recognize substances that are counterfeit and the necessary skills that you require in protecting public officials.Physical fitness is vital your success in this career; you will endure a physical training through a period as determined by the trainers. Every government has an affixed age requirement at the time of hiring, and you should be in that age bracket to qualify.A past criminal record may disqualify you, so you need to behave as per the rule of law. A clean record is therefore necessary. You will also be subjected to a medical test to prove you are fit and able to endure the exercise and job. Knowing what it takes to become the president’s security might be the first step to a vital career if this is your field of interest.…

McCarthy Bill Bans Millions More Guns Than The Infamous Clinton Gun Ban

McCarthy Bill Bans Millions More Guns Than The Infamous Clinton Gun Ban

On Feb. 14, 2007, Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) introduced H.R. 1022, a bill with the stated purpose, “to reauthorize the assault weapons ban, and for other purposes.” McCarthy`s choice of words warrants explanation.

Obviously, what she means by “assault weapons ban” is the now-discredited Clinton Gun Ban of 1994. Congress allowed the ban to expire in 2004 for multiple reasons, including the fact that studies by the Congressional Research Service, congressionally-mandated studies, and studies by state and local law enforcement agencies showed that guns affected by the ban had been used in only a small percentage of crime, before and after the ban was imposed.

Reauthorizing the Clinton ban would be bad enough. The guns that it temporarily banned–very widely used for target shooting, hunting and home protection–are still used in only a small percentage of crime. But McCarthy`s “other purposes” would make matters even worse. H.R. 1022 would ban every gun banned by the Clinton ban, plus millions more guns, including:

Every gun made to comply with the Clinton ban. (The Clinton ban dictated the kinds of grips, stocks and attachments new guns could have. Manufacturers modified new guns to the Clinton requirements. H.R. 1022 would ban the modified guns too.
Guns exempted by the Clinton ban. (Ruger Mini-14s and -30s, and Ranch Rifles; .30 cal. carbines; and fixed-magazine, semi-automatic, center-fire rifles that hold more than 10 rounds.)
All semi-automatic shotguns. (E.g., Remington, Winchester, Beretta and Benelli, used for hunting, sport shooting and self-defense. H.R. 1022 would ban them because they have “any characteristic that can function as a grip,” and would also ban their main component, called the “receiver.”)
All detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifles-including, for example, the ubiquitous Ruger 10/22 .22 rimfire-because they have “any characteristic that can function as a gopro gun mount rack.
Target shooting rifles. (E.g., the three centerfire rifles most popular for marksmanship competitions: the Colt AR-15, the Springfield M1A and the M1 “Garand.”)
Any semi-automatic shotgun or rifle an Attorney General one day claims isn`t “sporting,” even though the constitutions of the U.S. and 44 states, and the laws of all 50 states, recognize the right to use guns for defense.
65 named guns (the Clinton law banned 19 by name); semi-auto fixed-magazine pistols of over 10 rounds capacity; and frames, receivers and parts used to repair or refurbish guns.
H.R. 1022 would also ban the importation of magazines exempted by the Clinton ban, ban the sale of a legally-owned “assault weapon” with a magazine of over 10 rounds capacity, and begin backdoor registration of guns, by requiring private sales of banned guns, frames, receivers and parts to be conducted through licensed dealers. Finally, whereas the Clinton Gun Ban was imposed for a 10-year trial period, H.R. 1022 would be a permanent ban.

For latest presidential news  and Gun Ban Bill US. CLick here.

Should AR-15’s Be Legal? We Weigh the Pros and Cons

Should AR-15’s Be Legal? We Weigh the Pros and Cons

AR-15 guns are designed for a number of security purposes especially keeping you safe from terrorist attack.

Unfortunately, a number of these modern weapons have found their way in the wrong hands of terrorists and criminals who use them to endanger lives of the innocent.

Due to the misuse of these lethal weapons, the US government is still considering whether to take ownership of these guns legal or illegal.

Apparently, there have been a series of systematic mass shootings across the US and other parts of the world and many people have shifted their blame on weapons such as AR-15.

As such, possession of firearms has created a great rift between those who want the weapons to be clamped down and those in support for owning them citing cases of self-defense.

But before the relevant authorities take drastic measures regarding AR-15, let’s examine the merits and demerits of legalizing AR-15.

AR-15: Pros

Although there are mixed reactions to the presence of AR-15 and rifles in the hands of civilians, experts argue that the weapon was designed to eliminate the threat on the battlefield, especially with scopes for an ar-15 designed to kill.

That being said, these types of weapons have been useful in eliminating criminal activities in volatile areas and situations. In other words, AR-15 is a better choice for enhancing security in your neighborhood.

The weapon is light in weight thus making it quite practical and easy to maneuver with at the time of fire exchange. In fact, it is designed with a hollow tube that leads from the gas port back all the way to the receiver.

Being light makes the weapon easy to use, carry around and enables you to have an accurate shot. In this case, the AR-15 can be used to counteract terrorism and robberies with maximum results.

In addition, the weapon does not need intensive and long hours of training to know how to use it. Anyone with minimal training or practice is able to acquire the target with ease and accuracy.

On the contrary, this might be another weakness of this weapon, but a background check is necessary to establish the right people to own this assault weapon.

AR-15: Cons

Legalizing AR-15 guns might be a good idea to keep one safe but on the flip side, they may pose a threat to the society at the same time.

The fact that the gun is easy to operate, it does not mean that anybody should be allowed to own it.

This could be a security concern as witnessed in the recent cases where a number of school children and innocent citizens have perished in what has been termed as terrorism.

The description of the gun itself portrays a sensational and stigmatizing effect to those individuals who have grown up without prior knowledge of firearms.

Some experts refer to such weapons as semi-automatic but whichever the case, they remain lethal in the wrong hands.

The name change, however, was pushed by the 2013 Assault Weapons Ban but still, the negative aspect of owning an AR-15 is still evident from a series of bloody killing of the innocent in the recent past.

Therefore, each state has its own laws and regulations governing the ownership and usage of firearms. As a matter of fact, the acquisition of AR-15 should be legalized for those whose background check is not questionable.

In this era of terrorism and widespread crimes, you might save many lives by responding promptly to an assault of the similar magnitude.…

Follow Us