What impact will gun bans have on sales of gun equipment such as rangefinders and scopes?

Nowadays, guns are being used for several purposes. Security departments use the guns in order to protect the civilians and fight back the criminals. Some people use guns for their personal security as they believe their lives are at risk due to some personal issues. Some people keep the guns with them just as a hobby and they love having a collection of their own.

Unfortunately, there are some people who’re using guns for criminal activities due to which they put themselves and others at a great risk. The security departments have experienced a boost in the criminal activities after the invention of guns. Security departments are trying their best to control the criminal activities but the extensive use of guns is making it difficult for them to make their country a secure place.

The reason why we’re talking about guns only because guns are easily available to everyone and anyone can buy them from a store at a reasonable price while other weapons such as grenades aren’t easily available to everyone and that’s the reason why guns are mostly used in the criminal activities.

The government has sometimes tried to put a ban on the sale of guns but they failed just because some gun dealers and gun users protested against this ban. Gun dealers and hunters will be hugely affected by the bans on guns.

Problem for dealers

There are many gun dealers who’re working in different countries and different states and they’re earning good amount of money for their family. If the government puts a ban on the sale of guns, many gun dealers will suffer a lot and most of them will be broke just in a few months because this is all they’re doing to make a living.

Some of these dealers also sell some equipment that is related to the guns such as rangefinders and scopes. A ban on the sale of guns will not only affect the dealers but it will also cause a greater impact on the production companies.

Problem for hunters

The ban on guns will cause a greater impact on hunters as well because it will prevent them from doing something they love doing. There are many hunters who love their passion and they also keep all the important equipment with them such as the best rangefinder for long range shooting and the scope.

The ban on guns will make them suffer a lot and all the investment they’ve made on buying these things will go to waste.

Suggestion

The government should avoid taking such steps because it will boost the crimes instead of preventing them from happening. The reason is that gun dealers will sell their stocks to someone at lower rates to save their investment and no one else is going to buy that equipment but the criminals. And then the equipment will be used in criminal activities.

The government should try making strict rules about the sales of gun that dealers will keep all the important information of the person who’s buying a gun from them so that a person can easily be traced in case of a criminal act.…

Do games with bombs and guns cause more violence in kids?

Games are considered to be a way of fun and entertainment and children usually play a game in their spare time to find some peace of mind even some elders are playing different games these days to enjoy several moments of their life.

The gaming industry is growing amazingly these days. The ease of access and plenty of advanced options have made this industry grow very fast. There are plenty of games available these days that people play to find some peace of mind.

The problem is that many games that are being introduced these days, contain bombs and guns in them and there is a group of people that think that these kinds of games should be banned as they cause violence in kids.

I agree with these people but we should not completely ban these games as some of them are specially designed for education purpose such as Bomb It. So, instead of starting a petition against all such games, we should design a standard for such games around which these games can be developed.

Let’s take a look at several benefits of these games that make them appear more helpful.

Educational Purpose

There are plenty of games that are designed for the educational purpose and kids get to learn a lot from such games. So, the games that are designed for the educational purpose should be approved without any problem even if they contain bombs and guns with them.

You might be thinking that how can such games be educational. Well, there are different kinds of Guns that have been introduced these days. Most of the people are unaware of those guns. If our kids find a gun in a game, they’ll search for it and find the amazing features of this gun. They’ll get to know that how these guns and bombs are being used in several platforms.

Learn to face a situation

Most of the people get panicked when they see a gun or a bomb and the kids are more sensitive than elders. If your children know that how a gun or bomb is used, they’ll not get panicked and they’ll find the way of making themselves secure in such kind of situations.

Bravery

These kinds of games will help your kids become brave. Most of the kids become weak and coward as they’ve never tried a brave act in their life. Using guns and bombs is illegal in all the countries. But playing will these weapons will help your children become brave and strong and they’ll learn a way of fighting with a difficult situation.

Strong kids are more successful than those who’re mentally weak. Mental power means a lot when it comes to fighting against the hardships of this life. So, these games aren’t bad at all but the bad use of these games have made them appear so.…

HISTORY OF THE CLINTON GUN BAN

HISTORY OF THE CLINTON GUN BAN

Newly elected President Bill Clinton wasted little time in seizing upon “assault weapons” as a political issue. Along with “midnight basketball” and the never-to-be-fulfilled promise of 100,000 new police officers, it quickly became part of an effort to transform concern for public safety into a political issue.

Clinton had barely finished moving into the White House when he proclaimed we “can’t be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans to legitimately own handguns and rifles.” Then, stringing together several whoppers in a single sentence, he announced, “I don’t believe that everybody in America needs to be able to buy a semi-automatic or fully-automatic weapon, built only for the purpose of killing people, in order to protect the right of Americans to hunt and practice marksmanship and to be secure.”

Of course, not everybody in American can buy a firearm—felons, drug addicts, illegal aliens and fugitives from justice, for example, can not—and ownership of fully-automatic firearms has been heavily regulated by federal law since 1934. And, of course, semi-automatic firearms, which have been around for more than a century, are used by millions of Americans for hunting, self-defense, recreational target shooting and in formal marksmanship competitions such as the Olympics.

Like all firearms, except for fully-automatic machine guns, semi-automatics—including those defined as “assault weapons” by the Clinton ban—fire only once each time the trigger is pulled. They also use the same ammunition as other types of guns.

“Gun control” advocates claim that various military-style attachments—attachments that in their minds re-define semi-automatic firearms as “assault weapons”—provide advantages to criminals. But even the rabidly anti-gun Washington Post admits, “Assault weapons play a part in only a small percentage of crime.” Data from police experts must be deliberately avoided by those pushing “assault weapons” bills. A clear case in point is the internal memorandum to California Assistant Attorney General Patrick Kenady that warned: “Information on assault weapons would not be sought from forensics laboratories as it was unlikely to support the theses on which the “Assault Weapons” ban legislation would be based.”

Members of Congress who voted for the Clinton ban in 1994 disregarded hard evidence, pretending instead that BATF trace data “proved” widespread criminal “assault weapon” use. They ignored the Congressional Research Service’s finding that: “Firearms selected for tracing . . . cannot be considered representative of the larger universe of all firearms used by criminals, or of any subset of that universe. As a result, data from the tracing system may not be appropriate for drawing inferences such as which makes or models of firearms are used for illicit purposes.”

The American people eventually learned the truth, and it was not surprising then that pro-ban votes cost—by Bill Clinton’s count—at least 20 Democrats their seats in the next election. Nor was is surprising that less than two years after its passage, the House of Representatives voted 239 to 173 to repeal the Clinton gun ban.

A decade has passed, and both the facts and the goals of anti-gun politicians remain unchanged.

For Bill Clinton Gun Ban Bill and Gun Ban US. Visit www.clintongunban.com

What it takes to be the security for the President

What it takes to be the security for the President

Choosing a career is an important decision to make and choosing the right career is the right decision to make. The secret service is always looking to recruit talented and skilled individuals. It is the security in charge of the president and vice president’s protection and the protection of their immediate families.The president’s safety is the forefront of keeping a country safe because if the secret service does not protect the president, then the country is not protected.

This team carries out investigations, conducts research, analyzes information and prepare reports on matters concerning national security. Secret service agents work as a team with other partners of the government to unearth the needs of intelligence and report back to senior government offices. You must be mature and self-confident and possess excellent analyzing and investigative skills; must be able to examine situations fast to take the correct course of action.

You should be able to work in unpredictable conditions and environments of different threat levels. Prospective agents should be citizens and should earn a bachelor’s degree. The secret service does not necessarily point out the fields of study though it is advisable to take coursework in law, computer science, mathematics, communication and foreign languages. It is important to obtain a graduate level degree or gain experience in state or the local law enforcing agencies possibly as a police officer, and to get a Class D Security license to have an added advantage in the hunt for this job. This field will give you a notch over the others considering the experience part of the job.

 

 

After you qualify for the position, you get to spend many weeks training for the new job; this may include learning important police techniques such as how to use firearms and using them safely, what you are required to do with arms and when to use the arms. You also get to learn different methods on how to recognize substances that are counterfeit and the necessary skills that you require in protecting public officials.Physical fitness is vital your success in this career; you will endure a physical training through a period as determined by the trainers. Every government has an affixed age requirement at the time of hiring, and you should be in that age bracket to qualify.A past criminal record may disqualify you, so you need to behave as per the rule of law. A clean record is therefore necessary. You will also be subjected to a medical test to prove you are fit and able to endure the exercise and job. Knowing what it takes to become the president’s security might be the first step to a vital career if this is your field of interest.…

McCarthy Bill Bans Millions More Guns Than The Infamous Clinton Gun Ban

McCarthy Bill Bans Millions More Guns Than The Infamous Clinton Gun Ban

On Feb. 14, 2007, Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) introduced H.R. 1022, a bill with the stated purpose, “to reauthorize the assault weapons ban, and for other purposes.” McCarthy`s choice of words warrants explanation.

Obviously, what she means by “assault weapons ban” is the now-discredited Clinton Gun Ban of 1994. Congress allowed the ban to expire in 2004 for multiple reasons, including the fact that studies by the Congressional Research Service, congressionally-mandated studies, and studies by state and local law enforcement agencies showed that guns affected by the ban had been used in only a small percentage of crime, before and after the ban was imposed.

Reauthorizing the Clinton ban would be bad enough. The guns that it temporarily banned–very widely used for target shooting, hunting and home protection–are still used in only a small percentage of crime. But McCarthy`s “other purposes” would make matters even worse. H.R. 1022 would ban every gun banned by the Clinton ban, plus millions more guns, including:

Every gun made to comply with the Clinton ban. (The Clinton ban dictated the kinds of grips, stocks and attachments new guns could have. Manufacturers modified new guns to the Clinton requirements. H.R. 1022 would ban the modified guns too.
Guns exempted by the Clinton ban. (Ruger Mini-14s and -30s, and Ranch Rifles; .30 cal. carbines; and fixed-magazine, semi-automatic, center-fire rifles that hold more than 10 rounds.)
All semi-automatic shotguns. (E.g., Remington, Winchester, Beretta and Benelli, used for hunting, sport shooting and self-defense. H.R. 1022 would ban them because they have “any characteristic that can function as a grip,” and would also ban their main component, called the “receiver.”)
All detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifles-including, for example, the ubiquitous Ruger 10/22 .22 rimfire-because they have “any characteristic that can function as a gopro gun mount rack.
Target shooting rifles. (E.g., the three centerfire rifles most popular for marksmanship competitions: the Colt AR-15, the Springfield M1A and the M1 “Garand.”)
Any semi-automatic shotgun or rifle an Attorney General one day claims isn`t “sporting,” even though the constitutions of the U.S. and 44 states, and the laws of all 50 states, recognize the right to use guns for defense.
65 named guns (the Clinton law banned 19 by name); semi-auto fixed-magazine pistols of over 10 rounds capacity; and frames, receivers and parts used to repair or refurbish guns.
H.R. 1022 would also ban the importation of magazines exempted by the Clinton ban, ban the sale of a legally-owned “assault weapon” with a magazine of over 10 rounds capacity, and begin backdoor registration of guns, by requiring private sales of banned guns, frames, receivers and parts to be conducted through licensed dealers. Finally, whereas the Clinton Gun Ban was imposed for a 10-year trial period, H.R. 1022 would be a permanent ban.

For latest presidential news  and Gun Ban Bill US. CLick here.

Follow Us